Wouldn't it be nice to have an easy way to find out how much the
home you want to buy or sell is worth? Some consider price per
square foot to be a valid way to determine market value. The price
per square foot is arrived at by dividing the sale price or
estimated value by the number of square feet.
In
theory, by using the price-per-square-foot approach, you could
easily determine what price to pay for a listing. All you would have
to do is find out the price per square foot for a number of
properties that recently sold in the neighborhood that are similar
to one that you're interested in buying. Then average these figures
and multiple the average price per square foot by the number of
square feet in the home you want to buy.
Or, if
you were selling, you could determine how much your home ought to
sell for by finding out how much buyers paid on a price per square
foot basis for homes similar to yours.
There
are shortcomings to this approach. In areas where there is extreme
variability in home size, style, improvements and amenities, price
pre square foot could mislead you.
Consider three homes that sold within the last six months in
Piedmont, an upscale community in the east San Francisco Bay Area.
All had about 2,600 square feet. One sold for $712.16 per square
foot, another for $617.98 per square foot, and the third sold for
$484.18 per square foot. The average of the three is $604.77.
Given
the range of variability, if you used this average to base your
decision on what to offer on a Piedmont listing with approximately
2,600 square feet, you could end up paying way too much or offering
way too little. Likewise, if you used this information to select a
list price for your home, you could end up pricing it too high or
too low.
HOUSE HUNTING TIP: For a price per square foot to be a reliable
indicator of value, you need a standardized housing stock. For
example, it would probably be reliable for condominiums in a
development where all the units were the same size, had the same
ownership dues and offered the same amenities. But, as soon as
variability enters into the housing stock, price per square foot
alone won't tell the entire story.
When
planned unit developments are new, price per square foot is a useful
gauge. But, as these developments mature, so does the housing stock.
Some people will completely remodel within a couple of decades and
others may make only minor modifications. And, then there are those
homeowners who do nothing, thereby creating a neighborhood eyesore.
In
older neighborhoods, where homes weren't built at the same time or
in the same style, there's even more diversity. Within this varied
environment, certain types of homes may attract higher prices. For
example, in Piedmont, charming older homes in the center of town are
in high demand, and sell for much more than newer ranchers on the
edge of town. This accounts for the difference in price between the
houses mentioned above that sold for $712.16 and $484.18 per square
foot.
The
most accurate way to determine the estimated selling price for a
property is to compare all the attributes of that property with
similar properties that have just sold, not just the price per
square foot. Features like lot size and utility, the view, the
location and the quality of the finishes all have an effect on
value.
THE
CLOSING: The comparative approach to value is more subjective,
but makes up for the shortcomings of relying solely on price per
square foot.
Dian Hymer is author of "House Hunting, The Take-Along Workbook for
Home Buyers" and "Starting Out, The Complete Home Buyer's Guide,"
Chronicle Books.
Copyright 2005 Dian Hymer